Having read recently read Kevin Mullins' article detailing how he set the custom film profiles on his Fujifilm X-series cameras I was keen to give it a go on my new Fuji XT1. Although I've been shooting with my X100s for some time it's mainly been in RAW.
I was in Soho yesterday and decided to forgo the RAW, shoot JPEG and see how they came out. Let me be the first to say none of these are going to win any awards but they give a good cross-section of lighting situations.
The commonly accepted wisdom is that JPEG files just don't give the necessary flexibility in editing.
By virtue of the fact a RAW file includes all the available data and a JPEG doesn't, then the RAW file has to be the safer way to shoot. However do we always need that additional data?
If I'm shooting for a client then, yes, I'm going to buy the insurance of a RAW file. But if I'm just shooting some street photography as I wander Soho on a Saturday afternoon, then on the evidence of these shots, for me, JPEG is good enough.
Kevin details how he sets his custom settings in his post. I found when I used his settings on my X100s I was losing all the detail in the blacks. As the XT1 has the same sensor as the Fuji X100s I decided to back off the shadow settings a little. These are the settings I used:
Black & white (using the B&W+R film simulation) Highlights -1 Shadows +1 (KM: +2) Sharpness +1 (KM: +2) - this change more to see the difference than any science. Dynamic Range (Auto) White Balance (Auto) Noise Reduction -2
Generally, I'm really happy with the look. It's far more to my liking than JPEGs from my Nikon D700. The blacks in these shots aren't as dark as on the test with the X100s. If I were going to use these elsewhere I'd like to increase the contrast a little, so it could be my metering that was at fault on the first test. Maybe I'll give Kevin's settings another go.
If you're using the Fujifilm simulations I'd be interested in hearing the settings you're using?